| A Healthy Watershed?
It Depends on Your View…
Bill Foster
Watershed Educator
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Student Jessica Smith prepares to
collect water samples from the deck of the Haendel.
There is no substitute for direct experience! |
|
 |
 |
 |
Summer is the season when our attentions turn to the cool waters
of Cayuga Lake, our sparkling waterfalls, and the peaceful wooded
gorges that provide respite from the heat of the day. We revel
in the availability and beauty of our water resources, here in
the Finger Lakes region. We depend on them as communities, and
for many of us, they are a part of daily life — but what
do we know about our lake, or our stream systems? If these resources
are important to you, take a moment to consider what you know
about them, and what you might want to learn.
During 2002 volunteers participating in the Citizens’ Statewide
Lake Assessment Program (CSLAP) began collecting water quality
samples from four locations on Cayuga Lake. The results indicate
that Cayuga Lake is a fairly clean, high quality, body of water.
On the other hand, many lakeshore homeowners and recreational
users have a different impression. "Each day, our oars
hit pieces of garbage… or our fin becomes entangled upon
stray fishing line. The drainage from roads [provides] almost
a constant stream of murky brown water", according to Alex
Wolverton, an Ithaca High School rower. Lending weight to
this view is the fact that portions of the lake are classified
as impaired, on the basis of sediment and nutrient impacts, and
intermittent beach closures.
“Its been better over the past half dozen years-
clearer because of the zebra mussels, but weedier. What
zebras take away in terms of oxygen, the enhanced plant
growth puts back. The lake is good, but not great!”
- Dennis Montgomery, Captain, M/V Haendel.
|
Certainly, both impressions of Cayuga Lake cannot be true…
or can they? To understand these seemingly inconsistent opinions,
one must consider that CSLAP monitoring points are all located
well out from the shore of the lake, in deep, clear water. On
the other hand, for people observing the lake from the shore,
where water is shallow enough for weed growth, and under more
immediate influence from nearby tributaries, the view is much
different. The water and habitat in these two portions of the
same lake tell the stories of two quite different systems, which
is far from unusual. In fact, any observation of such a complex
system as a watershed is likely to be reflective of a specific
point of view.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| What will our watershed look like
when he grows up? |
|
 |
 |
Finding a way to assemble these many perspectives into a truly
complete picture is the focus of a major new Cayuga Lake Watershed
Network effort. Is the lake healthy, or are portions of the lake
in trouble? What about our streams and river corridors? Working
with partners throughout the Finger Lakes, the Network will host
a conference of researchers and regulators this fall, to discuss
just what type of data they have at their disposal, and how it
might start to truly shed light on the situation. Watershed Steward
Sharon Anderson notes, "The most important aspect is coordination.
Where are the gaps? How can we make data more usable for Cayuga
Lake and all of the Finger Lakes?"
Until the Network can share its findings, the best way for watershed
residents to realize the value of our waterbodies is to get out
and experience them individually. As you become familiar with
the waterway near your home — perhaps walking your stream
and comparing information with your neighbors — your understanding
of where water is coming from, where it is going, and how well
the system in working will surprise you. In our Spring 2003 edition,
George Patte wrote of his experiences with the Fall Creek Watershed
Committee, noting that, "this is exciting work for a group
of volunteers." Indeed, it is important work that affects
the future of our watershed. Critical decisions on water quality
goals, development and water usage are being made every day at
the federal, state and local levels of government, based on the
inconsistent, incomplete information presently available. If we
can create better data that tells a more complete story, and ensure
an informed public to participate in those decisions, we will
all be better served.
The recreational suitability of Cayuga Lake was mostly
favorable in 2002, ranging from “could not be nicer”
(southern basin) to “excellent” for most uses
(northern basin). This assessment was mostly consistent
with the measured water quality conditions in the lake.
– “CSLAP
Interpretive Summary for Cayuga Lake”, NYDEC,
February 2003. The full
report is available on the Network Website.
|
|