| Doc. # 2008-
Issue/Agenda Committee Meeting
Cayuga Lake Watershed Network
November 11, 2008
Finger Lakes Land Trust, 202 E. Court Street, Ithaca
Present:Ruth Richardson (chair), John Mawdsley,
Keith Tidball & Brian Boerman
Agenda items:
1. Update on 2008 programs (LFF, Report Card)
2. Looking forward to 2009 programs - how will the issues committee
role be different with "advocating" in our mission? Do
we need to recruit more experts/establish subcommittees?
3. The Phosphorus data and modeling: how do we want to disseminate
(spring conference? articles?)
4. The Aurelius Shale drilling - effects on water quality; do we
want to touch this one?
5. Scheduling monthly meetings
6. Other business
MINUTES:
1. Updates on 2008 programs: LFF: four awards this year (2 wineries,
1 dairy, 1 beef/grass-fed beef). There was supposed to be follow
up press; to Keith’s knowledge only one rerun seen in the
newspapers. NEED press release to Ag publications (Program Committee?
Dan?).
For 2009: should NOW be advertising. The “selection committee”
in the past years has had to do a lot more of the programming. The
LFF program is mature enough that it makes sense to simply hand
it off to others (program?) to run but with input from the issues
committee where needed. The selection committee could then be exactly
that rather than a subcommittee of the issues that runs the program.
If Dan Carrion were to take on organizing/admin of LFF, he would
be the program manager but the Program committee should provide
oversight. The issues would be available for advice and questions.
Report Card: Keith gave an update on the class progress (Keith
is the third instructor of the class along with Ed Mills & Rich
Stedman). The students are steering more toward a “Dashboard”
format than a “report Card” format. They are borrowing
a format from an Australian group and modifying it for the Cayuga
Lake watershed. The indicators are divided into several categories:
water quality; social wellbeing; landscape; others. The class meets
Thurs 11-1 in 1105 Bradfield and the issues committee members were
encouraged to attend the next meeting (at the time of recording
of these minutes the meeting had occurred; John Mawdsley, Ruth Richardson,
& Keith attended).
2. 2009 programs/Issues:
Programs:
a. Report Card/Dashboard. We should take what product the students
work up and continue with it. If students interested again next
semester, great. Even if not, we should look into getting funding
for getting measures of indicators.
b. Lake Friendly Farms (this could, as mentioned about, be largely
run outside the issues committee)
c. Spring & Fall Conference. Spring should be on P-data (models
& monitoring). Fall conference topics to be determined.
d. Engagement of North/central lake communities.
Issues:
Keith argued that all of our priority issues for 2009 fall under
one general topic of “Indicators & monitoring”.
There are three subcategories:
a. Report Card – what to measure; how to get community involvement
b. Monitoring & citizen support on the North/central ends of
the watershed.
c. Dissemination of existing data/results
3. P-data. It was agreed that the models/monitoring related to
Phosphorus should be the theme of the Spring Conferecnes. This includes
Roxy’s monitoring data, Doug Haith’s model & Todd
Walter’s model.
4 Marcellus Shale. Ruth pointed out that the gas drilling issues
around the Marcellus Shale (which includes some lands in the southeast
corner of the watershed) might not be unrelated to water issues
since the process of hydrofracturing (frac’ing) consumes up
to 1 million gallons of water. More information is needed (how much
land in the watershed is affected; what happens to the water) before
we make any judgment on whether this might be an issue of any concern.
5. Monthly meetings: will be on the second Tuesdays of the month
(the same evening as the Board Meetings). Meetings will begin at
5:30 and will, like the board meetings, move around the watershed.
The next meeting will be 5:30 pm on 12/9 at Keith’s home and
citizens around the Canoga subwatershed. will be invited to discuss
watershed issues.
|