| Doc. #2008-01
CAYUGA LAKE WATERSHED NETWORK
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
ITT/Goulds Pumps, Seneca Falls, NY
Directors present: Brian Boerman, Ronda Fessenden,
Deb Grantham, Doug Haith, John Mawdsley, Eric Reigel, Ruth Richardson,
Bill Shaw, Keith Tidball, Kevin Zippel
Excused directors: Joe Cambridge, Chuck Kroll,
Julie Patterson
Also in attendance: Sharon Anderson
The meeting was called to order at 7:03 pm by
John Mawdsley, Chairperson. The minutes of the meeting were accepted
with no amendments.
Items from the floor: : S. Anderson announced
that the Watershed Network received the Merit Award from the NYS
Soil and Water Conservation Society for our education and outreach.
Lake-friendly Farm and road ditch education programs were specifically
noted
Business:
Annual Appeal: to date there have been 48 contributions
totaling nearly $3000. S. Anderson requested the Board next year
set a goal. R. Fessenden, D. Grantham, K. Tidball, and K. Zippel
agreed to make follow up phone calls to past Board Directors.
Decade 2: J. Mawdsley reported there is strong support
for continuing to work as a network and to work on the watershed
scale. These terms may not need to be part of the organization’s
name. One objective is to modify the mission statement so that it
is clear to others and clearly guides the organization. Lively discussions
have covered how much in our second decade we should focus on education,
become advocates, and do field work; should the organization be
centered on the health of the lake, the lake and its tributaries
or all water resources in the watershed.
Nothing in the history or mission of the organization limits the
organization from advocating. The organization did not take a stand
on issues when it was a young organization. There has been a perception
among the Board Directors as well as the public that we don’t
take a stand. Admittedly, it is often difficult to take a stand
on issues because even just looking at the environmental ramifications
is often complex, let alone balancing human benefits and environmental
benefits. Some issues are clear and others take a great deal of
time. Board consensus was that there is no obvious limitation on
sensibly advocating on issues.
Initiatives and 2008 Plan of Work:
Committee Chairs met via conference call to consider special initiatives
for 2008 that go across committees. A major donor campaign, 10th
year celebration, the Aurora Initiative and fund raising are all
examples.
Committees were reminded to submit plans of work and budgets that
include the amount of staff time needed for support. If committees
make clear what staff is expected to do, she can estimate time and
staff dollars needed to provide that support. S. Anderson noted
that the planning checklists used for events such as Lakefest have
been extremely helpful for making clear what are volunteer responsibilities
and what staff is to handle. Committees are asked to consider how
committee activities support the organization and to balance costs
and benefits. Plans of work should note the purpose and benefits
of each item so they can be evaluated.
Grants and contracts cover many of the plan of work elements that
take staff time. S. Anderson listed both traditional and new projects
that must have unrestricted funds to cover any costs. Currently
there is not enough projected revenue to support staff involvement
in everything we would like to do. Some activities could be done
by volunteers with no or minimal staff time. Volunteer involvement
has an opportunity cost, though some volunteers want to give their
time to particular endeavors. Programs could be added as the year
progresses if committees and the Board secure funding. Prioritized
programs included the Aurora/Wells Initiative, major donor campaign,
Lake-friendly Farms, 10-year celebration, educational conferences,
and the report card.
There was consensus that some efforts could be combined such as
having the conference also be a venue to build relationships with
potential donors and a part of the 10th anniversary celebration.
J. Mawdsley and S. Anderson were charged with thinking this through.
S. Anderson noted that she received a draft document from the Outreach
Committee, with the message that it was not complete. Lakefest could
have been left off intentionally or just not added yet. In response
to a tie vote on the poster contest, as a new 2008 effort, the Board
came to consensus to support the contest in 2008 pending seeing
a plan from the Outreach Committee that shows how it can be undertaken
with no or minimal office staff support and what funds would be
needed. A suggestion was made to consider simplifying the plan for
this first year such as not doing a calendar and maybe limiting
to photography. Referred to the Outreach Committee for them to finish
the plan of work and budget.
B. Boerman explained three of the four areas of focus for the Issues
Committee are primarily covered with grant/contract funding: Aquatic
Weeds and Invasives, Monitoring and Modeling, and Stormwater. Specific
other advisory committees exist to support these efforts excepting
the Modeling, which the committee will continue to discuss. The
fourth area that as of yet does not have funding is the Report Card.
The Report Card fits in with the work being done by Decade 2 and
a Cornell graduate seminar has selected the Report Card as a focus
project. While the class will not be able to complete the report
card in the spring semester, it should provide the foundation for
a strong proposal for additional funding. The Committee is eager
to be involved. The main cost will be a small amount of staff time
to work with the Cornell class, which will do the bulk of the work.
S. Anderson to discuss funding with the Issues Committee.
2007 Budget and Financial update. S. Anderson provided
current year to date financial information along with projected
end of year figures using both a “cash basis” and our
“accrual basis.” Both reveal a modest, positive result.
B. Shaw noted that while certain invoices are not received, but
expected in January, that because we use the accrual accounting
system and they will be entered in 2008, the month and year we actually
receive the invoices or liability for payment. B. Shaw reported
that two of the Certificates of Deposit were cashed, per Board directive
in November. The remaining Certificate is Donor Restricted.
2008 Budget: S. Anderson presented her preliminary draft
of anticipated revenues, divided into restricted and non-restricted
categories. Those initial projected revenues would not cover her
preliminary projection of expenses. However, in-kind and cash received
in conjunction with the Aurora/Wells Initiative may significantly
change the budget as the year progresses. The Finance Committee
is reviewing her projections and committee requests and other revenue
sources for 2008 at its January meeting and will report back to
the Board with a range of proposed budgets for consideration at
the February meeting.
WQIP Contract: B. Shaw moved adoption of the resolution
provided by the Finance/Development Committee to accept a two year,
$60,000 contract for WQIP work for the Tompkins County Stormwater
Coalition (Doc # 2007-88). D. Grantham seconded. Unanimously passed.
2008 Retreat: B. Shaw moved that a Board retreat not be
held this year, due to existing commitments expressed by Board members
and financial concerns addressed earlier. K. Tidball seconded. Doug
Haith concurred. The Motion passed unanimously. In response to being
asked her opinion, S. Anderson replied that she supported the decision
unless something came out of the Decade 2 committee or the planning
for a major donor that suggested a longer meeting of the Board was
needed.
Reports:
Watershed Steward Report Doc# 2007-
The new policy of the Cayuga County Water Quality Management Agency
is that voting members need to be county residents. Directors from
Cayuga County should contact S. Anderson if interested in serving
or learning more.
The Board adjourned 9:07 p.m.
Task Summaries:
· D. Grantham will draft and send out a sample script and
S. Anderson to send out contact information for the annual appeal.
· R. Fessenden, D. Grantham, K. Tidball, and K. Zippel will
make calls by the end of this week.
· S. Anderson responsible for polling Directors on the date
for the January meeting.
· J. Mawdsley will follow up with Directors who are not currently
on a committee.
· Each committee is charged with submitting a plan of work
for 2008, creating a budget needed to complete that work, and identifying
potential funding. Submitted to S. Anderson ASAP. They were due
November 30, 2007.
· J. Mawdsley and S. Anderson to think through how to blend
events, such as the conference and the donor campaign.
Next Board Meeting: January 8, 2008 at Wells College,
Aurora, NY
Submitted by Brian Boerman, Secretary
|